The previous example used film for the source
images. Due to the limited dynamic range of digital cameras colour
correction is of limited use. Below is a repeat of the exposure correction
test using a digital camera.
Relative
exposure
(f stops) |
Original
Image |
Reference
Image |
Corrected
Image |
| -3 |
 |
 |
 |
| -2 |
 |
 |
 |
| -1 |
 |
 |
 |
| 0 |
 |
 |
 |
| +1 |
 |
 |
 |
| +2 |
 |
 |
 |
| +3 |
 |
 |
 |
| +4 |
 |
 |
 |
Some things to note:
- The shadow detail is better in +1
- The highlight detail is better in -1
- The highlight detail in the corrected +1 image has already been
reduced to noise, and spreads rapidly across the image as exposure is
increased.
- Shadow detail can be extracted from underexposed images but the colour
begins to degrade at -2 and noise is unacceptable at -3.
Film vs Digital.
Below is a comparison of the corrected images from both tests. While the
film image appears to have a lower contrast, this is because it contains far
more detail in the highlights and shadow. The equivalent detail in the
digital images is spread across exposures from +- to -1 (see above).
The biggest difference between film and digital is that film does not
have a distinct cut off of detail at under and over exposure. The
information in under and over exposed regions is somewhat compressed, but it
is still there. Once a digital image is overexposed, there is no information
left to retrieve.
Relative
exposure
(f stops) |
Corrected
Image |
Corrected Film
Image |
| -3 |
 |
 |
| -2 |
 |
 |
| -1 |
 |
 |
| 0 |
 |
 |
| +1 |
 |
 |
| +2 |
 |
 |
| +3 |
 |
 |
| +4 |
 |
 |
|